Thu 30 Nov 2006 - UN/CEFACT INVITED TO REVIEW AS 4590 Please submit your comments by 17:00 Wed 06 Dec 2006 to Stephen GOULD
10:41 Thu 30 Nov 2006 REF:UA1ACEI1 TO: Duane NICKULL cc proposed AS4590 eCommittee Vice-Chair Local Government Interested parties UN/CEFACT (Duane NICKULL is the Vice-Chairman of the United Nations Trade Facilitation XML Technical Group. He is the Architect of the UN/CEFACT eCommerce Strategy in the Asia Pacific region. In Jan 2005 Duane had agreed to speak at the proposed Australian CIT Industry Tsunami Relief Dinner) Hi Duane - this email is to enquire if you would have time to participate in an eCommittee to resolve a single XML Address format for the Australian XML Standard AS 4590 We are endeavouring to resolve an eCommerce XML Standards issue for a couple of major Local Government On-line projects here in Australia due to go live in 2007 I gave a paper at the recent OASIS XML Conference on the problem of two address formats within AS4590 During the Conferences delegates agreed to try to resolve the issue These are the two XML Address formats in AS 4590 It should not take much time at all as there are only two segments: A 16 Data Elements in the AS 4590 Address B 11 Data Elements in the AS 4590 Complex The solution appears to be to replace 4 Data Elements (Line 1, Line 2, Line 3 and Line 4) in the 1st Segment with the 11 Data Elements from the 2nd Segment The plan is to invite XML experts review the two XML formats in AS 4590 and agree by email during Dec 2006 that the two segments can be combined to form just one address segment. In addition we will point out the differences between the agreed Address Standard and the UN/EDIFACT Standard so that people are aware that there is a difference. Would this timetable for Dec 2006 suit you ? The eCommittee processes, which was developed as a RUBAC Joint Venture with the British Standards Institute, has been proposed to Standards Australia and Philip ARGY, President of the Australian Computer Society, to electronically clarify the AS 4590 XML format during Dec. Your participation would certainly illustrate the effectiveness of eCommunications for speedy dispute resolution as part of Trade Facilitation ! PS You may also be interested in how the problems of different reference numbers with the Eurofighter projects in Europe may render Electronic Hubs as unworkable for effective eCommerce and why the French proposal at TEDIS '89 for Electronic Notaries is a far more elegant and financially viable proposition for the complexity of Trade Information Flows as a solution for Trade Facilitiation. (The Trade Information Flow diagram is from the UN PortMIS Manual which was the basis of RUBAC development for the NSW Maritime Services Board and the Association of Australian Port and Marine Authorities) Regards Stephen GOULD Chair XML & Ecommerce Special Interest Group OPEN INTERCHANGE CONSORTIUM E: sggould@oic.org M: 0416-009-468