This email has been Faxed to the Chancellor of the University of Sydney, Her Excellency Professor M. BASHIR AC CVO. Over the past four weeks the Senior Officers listed on the Universities Australia web-site have been sent the emails as "Parents & Residents" detailing Public Concern over Council web-sites and the apparent deliberate avoidance of how to minimise Rate-payer costs. The Question for the Council Meeting Tue 07 Apr 2009 on Mosman Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan [GGRP] can be reviewed here NB Two websites www.ksas-au.net and www.smeems.net were unlawfully shut-down without Notice on Tue 10 Mar 2009 by the US Internet Service Provider [ISP] www.brinkster.com This occurred after an email was distributed about a committee to evaluate the proposed new contract for "Software-as-a-Service [SaaS] for the Shorelink Library Network. (Ref: AASAC8E1.htm) This contract had been awarded to an outsourced US based "Managed Services" company. This contract had been awarded without going to Tender which is in breach of the Local Government Act. www.brinkster.com happens to provide "Managed Services" hence our concern that Councils and Rate-payers can be held to Ransom by these overseas ISPs Mon 30 Mar 2009 Recipient: 612USa11 REF:AACACTN1 TO: Her Excellency Professor M. BASHIR AC CVO Chancellor F: {61}(2)9351-5705 UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY cc Concerned Residents UNIVERSITIES AS COUNCIL INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS [ISP] Dear Chancellor Further to our letter Wed 25 Mar 2009 this letter is to propose, with reasons and evidence, that Australian Universities should become the Internet Service Providers [ISP] for Council Communities. A REASONS AND EVIDENCE FOR UNIS AS LOCAL GOV ISPS a Governance and Probity Issues Australia has been at the forefront of Governance and Probity issues for a number of years with legislation that refers to Electronic Trading including the 1999 Federal Electronic Transaction Act [ETA1], 2000 NSW Electronic Transaction Act 2003 [ETA2] and the 2003 Spam Act. These Acts established Due Diligence processes and organisations like the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman [TIO] to ensure that the Public are protected in Australia. Unfortunately the majority of ISPs are not based in Australia probably because of the cost of compliance with Australian legislation. b Sustainability and Legal Quagmires Please find attached a very recent example where a USA based ISP stole without giving any notice 7 years Intellectual Property and the details of over 400 Australian Councils on an allegation of Spam. In 2001 a NSW Organisation was commissioned by the Federal Department of Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business [DEWRSB] to develop Intellectual Property to assist NSW Councils provide Electronic Delivery Services [EDS] {Att A}. Part of that 2001 Contract was to "3 Develop Business Modelling Tools that agencies could use to assess the viability of Electronic Service Delivery [ESD] Applications" After an extensive international evaluation of ISP capabilities a US ISP was selected and Australian Council information was stored on that ISP because in 2001 Australian ISPs could not provide the services required. The ISP is based in Phoenix Arizona and has 3 Directors listed on the web-site. The web-site states it has "2 million free, over 40,000 paid customers in 175 Countries" {Att B} Brinkster is now involved "Corporate Social Responsibility" which includes 1 Partnerships with Charities 2 Non-Profit Web Hosting Network 3 Environment 4 Global Social Responsibility Web Hosting Unfortunately none of that requires them to comply with the Law ! A letter to Jared STAUFFER Chairman and Chief Executive Officer [CEO] resulted in email from the Billing Clerk stating that the two sites had been closed down permanently without notice {Att C}. "Those that have complained reside in different countries. Due to privacy laws I (the Billing Clerk) am unable to say the names of those who complained of unsolicited email". It had already been pointed out that both the "USA Can-Spam Act 2003" and the "Australian Spam Act 2003" stated Spam was "unsolicited Commercial email" not emails in the Public Interest. Hence it appears that the details of 400 Australian Councils and 7 years Australian Intellectual Property including 3 years in Sustainability issues is now owned by the US ISP It appears that Sustainability issues are proving to be a Gold-mine for council legal departments, community groups and law firms judging by the 68 names listed in the "Gila River Indian Community Water Rights Settlement" dated 23 Jan 2009 {Att D}. NEXT STEPS We would appreciate the meeting with yourself to discuss how Australian Universities can fulfill the role of Internet Service Providers [ISP] for Local Government Agencies. Thank you. Yours sincerely Peter AXTENS LLB Official Agent SUSTAINABILITY ACTION NETWORK [SAN-2088] E: san.CITGovernance@gmail.com M: 0416-009-468 Att A 2001/03/26 Details Federal Objectives with Electronic Service Delivery [ESD] B Brinkster Directors - customers in 175 Countries C 2009/03/10 Letter from Brinkster (ISP) Billing Clerk D 2009/01/23 Gila River Water Rights 68 legal names RESPONSES ON EMAILS RE COUNCIL ECONOMICS Some of the responses on Council Economics can be reviewed on "Residents' Issues of Concern" The Background to the 3 Mosman Candidates from the "Sustainability Action Network [SAN]" can be reviewed on here AUSTRALIAN SPAM ACT 2003 The Australian Spam Act 2003 was reviewed in detail at the OIC seminar on 26 May 2005 The Australian Spam Act 2003 refers to Spam as "unsolicited commercial emails". Emails in the Public Interest such as this email are not classified as "unsolicited commercial emails" hence do not require an unsubscribe option. None of the email addresses were purchased and were collected according to the proper processes outlined in the Australian Spam Act 2003.[ Home ] [ KSAS-2088 ] [ Index-Council Letters ] [ Previous Letter ] [ Next Letter ] [ KSAS-Au Sponsorship ] [ Index Gap Issues ] [ Copyright ]